Saudi Arabia: Death by discrimination
The Saudi Arabian government continues to execute people at an average rate of more than two a week. Almost half of them - a disproportionately high number in relation to the local population - are foreign nationals from poor and developing countries.
"We had hoped that the much-heralded human rights initiatives introduced by the Saudi Arabian authorities in recent years would bring an end to - or at least a significant reduction in - the use of the death penalty. Yet in fact, we have witnessed a sharp rise in executions of prisoners sentenced in largely secret and unfair trials, making the need for a moratorium more urgent than ever," said Malcolm Smart, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International.
In 2007, there was a sharp increase in executions, with a total of at least 158 people put to death compared with 39 executions in 2006. So far this year, Amnesty International recorded a further 71 executions to the end of August, and the organisation fears that there could be a new surge of executions in the coming weeks following the end of the holy month of Ramadan.
"The Saudi Arabian government's continuing high use of the death penalty runs counter to the growing international trend towards abolition," said Malcolm Smart. "Moreover, the death penalty is carried out disproportionately and discriminately on national or ethnic grounds against poor foreign workers and Saudi Arabian nationals who lack the family or other connections that, fortunately, help others to be saved from execution."
All too often the defendants, particularly poor foreign migrant workers from developing countries in Africa and Asia, have no defence lawyer and are unable to follow the court proceedings, which are in Arabic. They and many of the Saudi Arabians who are executed also have no access to influential figures such as government authorities or heads of tribes, nor to money, both crucial factors in securing a pardon.
"The process by which the death penalty is imposed and carried out is harsh, largely secretive and grossly unfair. Judges, all men, have wide discretion and can hand down death sentences for vaguely-worded and non-violent offences," said Malcolm Smart. "Some migrant workers have even been unaware that they had been sentenced to death until the very morning of their execution."
Execution is usually by beheading, generally in public. In some cases, crucifixion follows execution.
Saudi Arabia is one of the few states in the world with a high rate of executions for women. It is also one of the few remaining countries to execute people for crimes they committed when they were still under the age of 18, in breach of international law. "It is high time for the Saudi Arabian government to step up to the plate on this issue and respect its obligations under international law," said Malcolm Smart. "As an elected member of the UN's Human Rights Council, the government should move quickly to reverse this ghastly trend and bring Saudi Arabia's legal and judicial practices into conformity with international standards. It must ban the death penalty for children, ensure fair trials, address rampant discrimination, and curtail judges’ discretionary powers in the use of this cruel, inhumane, and degrading punishment."


Comments
Alan McQueen | Posted on 18 October 2008, 09:56AM | Report comment
We should all be asshamed for continuing to support this dictatorship, the phrase Oil Blood is appropriate. The US bombed the wrong country, wonder why?
trudy joyce | Posted on 14 October 2008, 09:32PM | Report comment
what is going on here it seems so illogical….hmmm lets destroy our own population well now that is one of the most insane things to hear of date…what the??????