Human Rights Council divisions must not obstruct Gaza accountability
The political divisions surrounding the adoption of the Human Rights Council resolution on the human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories must not become an obstacle to investigations into serious violations of international law reported during the conflict in Gaza and southern Israel.
The resolution addresses human rights violations by the Israelis but, while condemning “all targeting of civilians”, fails to mention explicitly violations by Hamas and other Palestinian groups. It was passed with a divisive vote that saw countries from all regions abstain, oppose or refuse to vote on the resolution.
Although the resolution endorses the recommendations in the Goldstone report, the process that led to the passing of the resolution will make it more difficult for the United Nations to work constructively on giving effect to the report’s key findings.
In the Council’s debates on the Goldstone report, a preponderance of delegations from all regions acknowledged its value and called for an end to impunity and accountability for violations of international law committed by all parties to the conflict. However, we regret that, overall, member states failed to step up to the challenge to reach a formulation that would reflect the consensus on the need for accountability.
The resolution recommends that the UN General Assembly, the next body which is able to consider the Goldstone report, do so during its current session. We urge the Assembly to demand that both Israel and the Hamas de facto administration in Gaza immediately start independent investigations that meet international standards into alleged war crimes, possible crimes against humanity and other serious violations of international law reported during the conflict.
The investigations must be in line with the recommendations made in the report of the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict headed by Judge Richard Goldstone
The General Assembly must set up a committee of independent and impartial experts in international law to assess the effectiveness and genuineness of the measures taken within a set time frame by Israelis and Palestinians, as well as their compatibility with international standards, or request the UN Secretary General to do so.
It must also make provision to address any failure by Israeli or the relevant Palestinian authorities to effectively address accountability.
The Goldstone report concluded that Israel as well as Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups in Gaza committed grave violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, including war crimes and possible crimes against humanity.
Its findings are fully consistent with those of Amnesty International and other human rights organisations that carried out similar investigations.
No credible investigation has so far been conducted by either Israel or the Palestinians.
Amnesty International reminds states party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions of their individual responsibility for ensuring accountability by exercising universal jurisdiction in initiating criminal investigations in national courts, where there is sufficient admissible evidence of grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.
The organization believes that accountability for serious violations international law is an essential component of the process for establishing a just and lasting peace in the region.


Comments
James | Posted on 28 October 2009, 10:13AM | Report comment
Steve, have you read the article above? You’re apparently commenting on it. The second paragraph raises the issue of the failure of the Human Rights Council resolution to “mention explicitly violations by Hamas and other Palestinian groups”. The article then continues with the need for credible investigations into human rights violations by ALL PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT, including relevant Palestinian authorities as well as Israel. I’m not sure what cause you’re aiding when you display such uncritical knee-jerk reactions to Amnesty’s clearly human rights-driven work. Questions like “Why is AI on this Israel-bashing bandwagon” in the face of a balanced call for investigation into human rights abuses by all sides clearly reveals that you’re pushing a personal agenda rather than engaging with the article. But this website is for everyone to post their views on, so feel free to continue.
Steve Lieblich | Posted on 27 October 2009, 12:47PM | Report comment
From The Guardian, Tuesday 20 October 2009, by Harold Evans:
“It was to be expected that ...the risible UN human rights council would be eager to condemn Israel… If you treat people as the Chinese do the Tibetans or Uighurs (“Off with their heads!”); or as the Russians eliminate Chechen dissidents; or as the Nigerians tolerate extrajudicial killings, the evictions of 800,000, rape and cruel treatment of prisoners; or as the Egyptians get prisoners to talk (torture) and the Saudis suppress half their population … well, go through the practices of all 25 states voting to refer Israel to the security council for the Gaza war, and you have to acknowledge they know a lot about the abuse of humans. Anything to divert attention from their own atrocities.”
For the full article, see http://jiw.blogspot.com/2009/10/moral-atrocity.html
My question is: why is AI on this Israel-bashing bandwagon?
Elka | Posted on 24 October 2009, 05:28PM | Report comment
This is the link to the Youtube Video in which Col. Richard Kemp responds to the U.N. Goldstone Report.
See it before you make up your mind on this important issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX6vyT8RzMo
Elka | Posted on 24 October 2009, 05:22PM | Report comment
What Col. Richard Kemp has to say on Gaza is amazing and everyone should watch it. This video has made it into Youtube’s Top 100 on this topic. It also mentions International Human Rights Groups and their sometimes ‘Pavlovian Response’ when reacting to anything Israel-related. Must See.