Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Nigerian Bar Association Human Rights Institute and other Nigerian human rights non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are deeply concerned by reports of a decision by the Nigerian government to resume the execution of prison inmates. The reason given by the authorities for the resumption is to ease prison congestion.

Instead of executing prisoners, the Nigerian authorities should address underlying problems in the criminal justice system. The overcrowding is in part due to delays in trials and failure to provide enough lawyers. Many death row prisoners may be innocent, as Nigeria’s justice system is riddled with flaws and is unable to guarantee fair trials.

The decision to execute death row inmates to ease prison congestion was taken at a meeting of the National Economic Council (NEC) on Tuesday 15 June 2010. The meeting was chaired by the Vice President of Nigeria and attended by Nigeria’s 36 state governors. Following the meeting, the Governor of Benue state announced that the Council had asked the Nigerian state governors to review all cases of death row inmates and to sign execution warrants as a means of decongesting the country’s prisons. This is the second time in two months that Nigeria’s state governors have considered the execution of inmates to ease prison congestion. In April 2010, a similar decision was taken in a meeting of the Council of States, a meeting of the 36 state governors, chaired by the President of Nigeria.

The resumption of executions is the wrong solution to the problem of overcrowding. According to Nigeria’s Minister of Interior, the total prison population is 46,000, of which some 30,000 are awaiting trial. Few inmates can afford a lawyer and the government funded Legal Aid Council only has around 100 lawyers. Prisons will remain overcrowded until these underlying problems are addressed.

There are approximately 870 death row inmates currently in Nigeria’s prisons, including women and juveniles. However, weaknesses in the Nigerian criminal justice system means that hundreds of those awaiting execution on Nigeria’s death rows did not have a fair trial and may therefore be innocent.

Trials can take more than 10 years to conclude. Appeals in some death row cases have been pending for a decade. Some appeals never happen because case files have been lost but the person remains on death row.

Two expert groups set up by former president Olusegun Obasanjo – the National Study Group on Death Penalty (2004) and the Presidential Commission on Reform of the Administration of Justice (2007) – recommended a moratorium on executions because the criminal justice system can not guarantee a fair trial.

The organisations call on the Nigerian government to establish an official moratorium on the death penalty as a first step towards abolition. By declaring a formal moratorium on executions, the Federal Government of Nigeria would be exercising important leadership on the issue of the death penalty in line with the global trend towards abolition. A moratorium on executions requires a commitment by all Nigerian authorities not to carry out executions, regardless of whether death sentences have been passed. A moratorium would eliminate the risk of executing the innocent as well as prisoners who have not yet exhausted their right to appeal.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Nigerian Bar Association Human Rights Institute and other Nigerian human rights non-governmental organisations (NGOs) oppose the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender, or the method used by the state to kill the prisoner.


Under international human rights law, the death penalty must not be imposed for crimes committed by people below 18 years of age and people charged with capital crimes are entitled to the strictest observance of all fair trial guarantees.

In November 2008, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights at its 44th Ordinary Session in Abuja, Nigeria, adopted a resolution calling on state parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to observe a moratorium on the death penalty.

In December 2007 and 2008, the UN General Assembly also adopted two resolutions on the use of the death penalty calling upon states that still maintain the death penalty to progressively restrict the use of the death penalty; reduce the number of offences for which it may be imposed and establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty.

While Nigeria did not adopt an official moratorium on executions, the Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs stated in February 2009 at the 4th Session of the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR) that Nigeria has a "self imposed moratorium."

In 2006, at least six death row prisoners were executed without ever having had an opportunity to appeal their death sentence. They had been tried and convicted by Robbery and Firearms Tribunals under the jurisdiction of the military.

Any step by the Nigerian government, state or federal, to resume executing will be contrary to commitments made by Nigeria at international level.


Access to Justice (AJ)

Amnesty International (AI)

Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD)

Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR)

Human Rights Law Service (HURILAWS)

Human Rights Social Development Environmental Foundation (HRSDEF)

Human Rights Watch (HRW)

International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law (Intersociety)

Legal Defence and Assistance Project ( LEDAP)

Legal Resources Consortium (LRC)

Nigeria Humanist Movement

Nigerian Bar Association Human Rights Institute (NBAHRI)

Ogoni Solidarity Forum (OSF)

Prisoners Rehabilitation and Welfare Action (PRAWA)

Social Action (SA)

Social Justice Advocacy Initiative (SJAI)

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP)