Asylum seeker detention conditions deteriorating rapidly
Amnesty International has warned that detention conditions on Christmas Island are deteriorating rapidly and asylum seekers there, as well as in other detention centres around the country, are at grave risk of self-harm and mental illness.
An Amnesty International delegation has just returned from an inspection tour of Christmas Island, the Curtin detention centre in Western Australia, and detention facilities in Darwin.
“Morale within Australia’s detention facilities is quickly getting worse, leading to rising incidences of self-harm and attempted suicide,” said Dr Graham Thom, Refugee Campaign Coordinator for Amnesty International Australia.
“The mood on Christmas Island is particularly despondent. While meeting with asylum seekers there last week, I met grown men who were reduced to tears within minutes and who showed me scars from where they had been harming themselves. These are blatant symptoms of a system that is failing the people it is supposed to protect.”
With some 5,000 asylum seekers now being held in unacceptable conditions in centres across Australia, Amnesty International is calling on the government to urgently rethink the policies of mandatory detention and offshore processing.
Conditions on Christmas Island are especially worrying. More than 350 people are being detained in tent-style accommodation and additional facilities are hastily being erected to cope with new arrivals. Some asylum seekers have been detained on the remote island for over 16 months.
Of particular concern to Amnesty International is the length of time it is taking the Department of Immigration to process claims, the detention of large numbers of children, and the lack of adequate medical, mental health and counselling services available to the growing populations in such remote detention centres.
“The negative effects of long periods of detention, especially in remote locations, are well known,” said Graham Thom. “Detention is particularly harmful to children and to survivors of torture and trauma. It is unacceptable that the government has let the situation deteriorate to the point where we are again seeing asylum seekers self-harming.”
The Australian Government has a legal responsibility not to arbitrarily detain asylum seekers, or to subject them to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Amnesty International does not believe current detention conditions are in keeping with this responsibility.
Amnesty International has also questioned the decision to reopen the Curtin Immigration Detention Centre in remote Western Australia. Around 750 Afghan men, the majority of whom were subject to the recently-lifted six month processing suspension, are being detained there. Steps are currently being taken to increase the centre’s capacity to 1,200.
“The decision to reopen Curtin defies logic,” said Graham Thom. “The centre is isolated and summer temperatures there reach well over 40 degrees. The men detained there, many of whom are survivors of torture and trauma, are facing over a year in these extreme detention conditions while their claims are assessed. This is absolutely inappropriate.”
More than 700 asylum seeker children, including a significant number of unaccompanied minors, are currently being detained in what the government calls ‘alternative places of detention,’ or APODs, which are monitored by security staff 24 hours per day.
“The number of children in being held in these places is rapidly approaching the highest levels seen during the Howard era. And to claim, as the government does, that children are not being held in detention centres in Australia is simply disingenuous,” said Graham Thom.
Amnesty International notes some commendable efforts being made by staff from the Department of Immigration and other agencies to improve conditions for people being detained. However, the organisation warns that the Australian Government risks creating increasingly serious problems if it does not immediately move to address in a more comprehensive way the problems emerging within the system.
“The Gillard Government needs to urgently move to a more sustainable means of processing asylum applications on the Australian mainland,” said Graham Thom.
“The last thing Australia should be seeking to do is export the problem to countries such as East Timor, when it is clear that our government has so far been incapable of dealing with the situation humanely on its own territory,” said Graham Thom.
Amnesty International believes that as a matter of priority, the Minister for Immigration, Chris Bowen, should immediately arrange appropriate community alternatives to detention for families with children, unaccompanied minors and survivors of torture and trauma.
Background
From 2 – 9 October 2010 Amnesty International visited the Northern Immigration Detention Centre and the APODs (alternative places of detention) in Darwin, the Curtin Immigration Detention Centre, and detention facilities on Christmas Island.
The visit was organised in cooperation with the Department of Immigration and Citizenship. While visiting the centres Amnesty International had the opportunity to meet with detained asylum seekers on both an individual and group basis. The organisation also met with staff and service providers.


Comments
Andrew J S | Posted on 25 October 2010, 11:53AM | Report comment
Ideally refugees would integrate into the community and become productive members, many however as a result of the pain and suffering they have gone through will not be able to reach their full potential and will in fact place pressure on existing healthcare facilities. We of course have an obligation to help our fellow human beings but we also have an obligation to our future generations to plan adequately for their future - is the mix of immigration we have correct today, or do we need to decrease all other immigration and increase refugee intake? No matter what mix we have - there is more refugees in the world than Australia can support - so at some point we have to determine a quota - is the current quota right?, if not what is the right mix or solution?
Pluto | Posted on 25 October 2010, 11:06AM | Report comment
I have to disagree with you Andrew. Yes, our resources are not particularly expendable, however, each of those asylum- seekers is a suffering soul that is willingly to stay and start a new life. Each of them will become a valuable worker if s/he has the proper training. These new people will provide Australia a whole new work force, solving not only the issue of resources, but also the national aging problem. If they are properly trained and become productive to Australia, isn’t it a win-win situation?
andrew j s | Posted on 25 October 2010, 10:49AM | Report comment
Australia, despite being labled rich, still has a limited capacity to support a larger population.
Regardless of where the populuation growth comes from, the resouces to support it are already quite streched. Specifically water resources. If population is allowed to grow unchecked the living standards will decline quite rapidly. And yes refugees are a very small part of population growth, however they have the potential to get out of hand quickly - and each refugee can use family reunion to further increase population when they eventually become citizens, Is there a viable alternative to the current immigration policy?
Marolyn Hamilton | Posted on 24 October 2010, 12:08PM | Report comment
Take a few minues and imagine that you are an asylum seeker having fled your counry of birth in fear. It could be for just one of many reasons: been tortured, family members disappeared or killed, threat of death by the Taliban if you don’t join their army, persecuted for speaking out or printing material supporting democracy, being a peaceful protester, your religious beliefs or assisting Aussie servicemen.
Granting asylum to boat people who have no queue to jump is a Human Rights issue. Australia is anticipating 35m population. It’s a rich country so let it work out how it is going to sustain that population by starting with giving desperate people citizenship in Australia.
Marolyn Hamilton
thevoiceofreason | Posted on 22 October 2010, 12:26PM | Report comment
Andrew; refugees have to apply for Newstart allowance like everyone else. They receive the same benefits are are not treated any differently to our homeless and disadvantaged citizens - of course other than the fact they are imprisoned in terrible conditions for an undeterminable amount of time when they are already in an extremely distraught frame of mind.
Pluto | Posted on 21 October 2010, 09:42PM | Report comment
I agree with you Andrew as far as that we should not over fund them. However, most of them came for a new life, not being imprisoned and free food. I believe the best solution for this situation is a speedy processing procedure for immigration, also a greater availably of education for them so that they can truly start a new life without bing behind bars.
Andrew J S | Posted on 21 October 2010, 01:58PM | Report comment
Agree the length of detention is too long, but what is the viable alternative? letting them roam free unchecked into the community? If certain security and health checks are performed, and if there is assurance they won’t dissappear, i don’t have a problem with this - i do have a problem with Tax dollars giving them free food, shelter, homes, internet, clothing when many in this country struggle to have those things. An Asylum seeker deserves no more funding than our own homeless and disadvantaged citizens
flaub | Posted on 18 October 2010, 10:05PM | Report comment
You will not defend your superior Western culture - you will be swamped and destroyed.
Doubtless its what you deserve.
May-Lin Liew | Posted on 18 October 2010, 12:36PM | Report comment
Asylum-seekers arriving australia are not illegal, have not committed any crime and should not be held in detention. Mandatory detention, especially prolonged, of asylum-seekers is plainly wrong and inappropriate, and in the case of innocent people, cruel and harsh. The Australian Govt should release asylum-seekers into the community, on “bail”, if you like, immediately. Our current treatment of men, women and children, most of whom have escaped danger, torture and life-threatening situations, is unacceptable and breaches our human rights obligations. Surely, it is not difficult for us, a wealthy and prosperous nation, to lend a helping hand to these traumatised and damaged people? Free them, I say!
Georgia S. | Posted on 18 October 2010, 12:14PM | Report comment
I agree the time that the refugees stay in the detention centres is ridiculas.
Pluto | Posted on 16 October 2010, 11:16PM | Report comment
i reckon we should perhaps lock those parliament authority for even a month to give them a taste of freedom denial. I understand that immigration,documentation and such takes time.. but 16 months? it is just ridiculous. Also, people who seek safe ended up trying to kill themselves? Shouldn’t it be a slap on the face?
Georgia S. | Posted on 16 October 2010, 11:05PM | Report comment
The conditions in the refugee centres are utterly sickening. The refugees are human beings, just like us. All Australians are descended or are from another country. The refugees flee thier homeland in very dangerous conditions in the hope that they will have a future, one that they will be free. I myself am a second generation Australian with a wide multicultural diversity and I feel stongly for the refugees to live, have freedom and have a better future in Australia.
Frederika Steen | Posted on 15 October 2010, 11:57PM | Report comment
plse tell up front what the word limit is! I wasted time writing a constructive comment .