Climate of fear in Syria’s hospitals as patients and medics targeted
The Syrian government has turned hospitals into instruments of repression in its efforts to crush opposition, Amnesty International said today in a new report.
The 39-page report Health crisis: Syrian government targets the wounded and health workers (PDF 1.6 mb) documents how wounded patients in at least four government-run hospitals have been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including by medical workers.
Hospital workers suspected of treating protesters and others injured in unrest-related incidents have themselves faced arrest and torture.
"It is deeply alarming that the Syrian authorities seem to have given the security forces a free rein in hospitals, and that in many cases hospital staff appear to have taken part in torture and ill treatment of the very people they are supposed to care for," said Cilina Nasser, Amnesty International Middle East and North Africa researcher.
"Given the scale and seriousness of the injuries being sustained by people across the country, it is disturbing to find that many consider it safer to risk not having major wounds treated rather than going to proper medical facilities."
Amnesty International found that patients have been assaulted by medical staff, health workers and security personnel in at least the National Hospitals in Banias, Homs and Tell Kalakh and the military hospital in Homs.
One doctor at Homs military hospital told Amnesty International he had seen four doctors and more than 20 nurses abusing patients.
”Ahmed” was delivered unconscious to the National Hospital in Tell Kalakh on 22 August after being beaten by security forces. A witness saw him in the emergency room:
"There were around seven or eight security men, some carrying rifles, and nurses wearing white robes crowded around him. He opened his eyes and said: 'Where am I?' They all suddenly jumped on him and started beating him and hitting him."
Patients have also been removed from hospitals. On 7 September, security forces looking for an alleged armed field commander opposed to the government raided al-Birr wa al-Khadamat Hospital in Homs. When they did not find him, they arrested 18 wounded people.
A health worker present during the raid told Amnesty International he saw at least one unconscious patient having his ventilator removed before he was taken away.
Afraid of the consequences of going to a government hospital, many people have chosen to seek treatment either at private hospitals or at poorly equipped makeshift field hospitals.
Doctors at the National Hospital in Homs told Amnesty International that the number of admissions for firearms wounds has dropped significantly since May, in contrast to the spiralling toll of deaths and injuries on the streets outside.
But blood supplies in Syria can only be obtained from the Central Blood Bank, which is controlled by the Defence Ministry, leaving private hospitals with a terrible dilemma. One medic who had worked a private hospital in Homs told Amnesty International:
"We faced a dilemma every time we received a patient with a firearm injury and an urgent need of blood: if we send a request to the Central Blood Bank, the security would know about him and we would be putting him at risk or arrest and torture, and possibly death in custody."
Medical workers have themselves been targeted by security forces, some for treating injured people, others on suspicion of attending demonstrations or filming protesters.
On 7 August, around 20 soldiers and security forces raided a government hospital in Homs governorate, arresting seven hospital workers. One of the group told Amnesty International about his interrogation, during which some of his colleagues were badly beaten:
"[The interrogator] asked: 'do you want to be tortured or do you want to talk?' ... He accused me and my colleagues of treating the wounded without reporting them to the authorities, and asked me for the names of the wounded."
Amnesty International called on the Syrian authorities to give strict and clear instructions to all hospitals to accept and treat all wounded patients without delay, and to prioritize the interests of the patients over any other priorities.
"Syrian medical workers are being placed in an impossible situation - forced to choose between treating wounded people and preserving their own safety," said Cilina Nasser.
"The Syrian authorities must see sense and urgently act to ensure that all patients are treated equally, without discrimination based on their suspected political loyalties or activities."
“Anyone, whether a health worker or a member of the security forces, who is suspected of delaying, obstructing or interfering in the work of health workers providing treatment to the wounded must be held to account.”


Comments
radev | Posted on 19 January 2012, 09:29AM | Report comment
Hi Lachlan. Thanks for those links. I do admit my impression of AI has been modified somewhat, reading about the work undertaken by the organization. I would have been impressed had there been unequivocal causal links to AI’s actions and the outcomes in those instances. I am subject to correction here; I did not go through the material with a fine tooth comb!
However your last two sentences of paragraph 3 do cause concern; if the Canadian newsreport is accurate. Those 2 statements are very ‘elastic.’
Michael Wild | Posted on 11 January 2012, 12:37PM | Report comment
Rajev you poor little petal. Just read what you wrote and the tone that you used and perhaps you might get set insight.
Lachlan, Amnesty International Australia. | Posted on 11 January 2012, 09:42AM | Report comment
Radev,
The Walk-a-thon was organized by the CTC, but the funds raised came from hundreds of individuals taking part in the event and from numerous sponsors, including small businesses within the Tamil Canadian community. The purpose of the event is to offer Tamil Canadians an opportunity to provide financial support to organizations in Canada involved in social, health and justice causes. Previous recipients in 2009 and 2010 were the Sick Kids Hospital Foundation and the Canadian Cancer Society.
We do not consider that this impairs the independence of Amnesty International in any way. The support is not at all tied or linked to our human rights programming. It is offered with no conditions or qualifications. While it was generated through one event, the funds come from hundreds of individuals and small businesses.
We have occasionally worked with the Canadian Tamil Congress with respect to human rights concerns affecting the Tamil community, including issues related to the Canadian refugee system. That is common practice for Amnesty International across the entire range of our human rights work. We often join with organizations large and small representing the rights and interests of communities we work with; when our concerns and recommendations overlap. We will continue to do so when appropriate with the CTC.
Regarding Amnesty’s specific achievements, you can read about some of the highlights from 2011 here: http://www.amnesty.org.au/landing/comments/27484/ - or explore our good news and successes section of our website here: http://www.amnesty.org.au/success/
Regards,
- Lachlan, Amnesty International Web Team
radev | Posted on 11 January 2012, 07:50AM | Report comment
Michael, thanks you for the clarification about the Nobel Peace Prize in 1977. Actually that (34 years ago) was indeed an era when even I believed that INGOs were sincere. I am however intrigued as to why my enquiry elicited a somewhat aggressive response.
Michael Wild | Posted on 10 January 2012, 11:34PM | Report comment
Well actually Radev it won a Noble prize for Peace and is one of the most widely respected non-partisan organizers. If you read this website it will show you a number of success in terms of released Prisoners of Conscience and such like. Tell me Radev how many Noble Prizes for Peace have you and your Sri Lankan partisans won?
radev | Posted on 10 January 2012, 06:05PM | Report comment
What are AI’s actual achievements/ As against mere reports appeals and letters. Also it will be interesting to know - given the Canadian funding news - the sources under Defenders Pledges.
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 10 January 2012, 05:49PM | Report comment
For a better understanding of events in Syria, please check the references on the list provided by ‘Australians for Syria”. The cliches and unverifiable claims presented in the media are not helpful.
http://australiansforsyria.wordpress.com/2012/01/01/list-of-reference-material-for-people-keen-to-understand-the-bigger-picture-behind-the-crisis-in-syria/
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 10 January 2012, 04:02PM | Report comment
Hi Redev, It seems to me the issue you are raising needs serious investigation. I understand why it might be a concern for Sri Lankans who do not want to be pulled back into conflict and terror.
Hi Mieszko,
There may or may not be a ‘global conspiracy against the Syrian people’. But I think the following has to be addressed by AI:
1. The fatwas of prominent clerics, especially those of al-Qaradawi. When he calls on his followers to overthrow the Syrian government and says never mind how many people get killed in the process, this must be a considered a crime against humanity, surely? It could be claimed that he is encouraging a ‘genocide’ in Syria as the victims of his fatwa would be mostly from minority groups. Surely Amnesty has something to say on this? Imagine if it were a KKK leader calling for the deaths of black people in the US to achieve a white supremacist nation. Is it so different? The ‘problems’ imagined or real may be different, the ends may be different, but the means to achieve the ends much the same: the killing of millions of people and the inevitable destruction of a country so extremists can rid the state of people they do not approve of.
2. The manner in which information is gathered by AI in regard to the people killed and injured etc in Syria. I know of 7 people connected to my friends who were killed in April by armed men. Yet, AI has not been even-handed and open to the possibility of armed men committing atrocities from March or April. I would like to think that 99% of AI members would be appalled by the fact that AI has been ignoring the terror for so many months. One friend in Amnesty assured me that AI is ‘even-handed’. But I’m not convinced. The work AI did in 2010 in regard to Syria was similar to any other country, maybe. But the situation is much more complex today, and AI is a player by turning a blind eye to the perpetrators and victims of terror. It helps enable that terror to continue.
.
radev | Posted on 10 January 2012, 11:50AM | Report comment
LTTE arm funds Amnesty Int’l
The world’s self-proclaimed human rights watchdog – Amnesty International (AI), was now being bought over by the pro-LTTE organisations in Canada, reports from Toronto said. The Canadian Tamil Congress (CTC), an ardent supporter of the LTTE, has now completed collecting a first grant of US $50, 000 for AI. This grant has been confirmed by Alex Neve, Secretary General of Amnesty International in Canada. The pro-LTTE CTC kicked off collecting funds for AI from last September, organising a Canadian Tamil Walk-A-Thon at Thomson Memorial Park, Scarborough.
AI has been aware of how the pro-LTTE CTC plundered money from Canada’s Tamil population since 2005. Ignoring all such anti-human actions, AI is now accepting grants from the CTC, the report added.
In August 2006, nine Tamil Tiger supporters, including four from Canada, were arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the US for attempting to buy Russian-made missiles and firearms for the LTTE, a group listed as a ‘terrorist’ organisation by the U.S. One of the Canadians, Sahilal “Sahil’ Sabaratnam, was described by the authorities as the financial mastermind of the operation. At the time, Sahilal Sabaratnam was listed as the Director, Communications, of the CTC.
See http://www.nation.lk/2011/12/25/news1.htm
for full report
Mieszko | Posted on 13 December 2011, 10:46AM | Report comment
I don’t think it’s even that Suzan. To me it looks like the doctor is trying to get the crowd to back off. I can’t seem to find the Amnesty or Al Jazeera article/video that you are referencing however. Have you got a link?
Amnesty has taken the same stand it always does; it speaks out against human rights abuses no matter who the perpetrator is - be it Israel, Hamas, America, the Syrian government, NATO forces in Libya or the hundreds of other parties routinely criticised by the organisation.
Now, maybe there is a vast global conspiracy against the Syrian people—or perhaps the Syrian government really IS ruthlessly stifling dissent with murder and torture. That of course, does not mean that other non-state actors joining the anti-government movement all have pure motives and are unarmed, peaceful protestors. Similarly, there could be larger influences at work in regards to a political response. These phenomena ARE NOT mutually exclusive, which zealous critics on either side of this ‘debate’ find very difficult to comprehend. It is incredible frustrating.
The Syrian government is killing and torturing dissenters - peaceful or not. The Syrian government still has pretty considerable public support. As the dissent-quashing continues, armed groups are now joining the anti-government fray.
If anyone can pull some kind of coherent, clear moral standpoint on the current situation in Syria - along with a correct way forward - they must be some kind of magician.
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 12 December 2011, 07:15PM | Report comment
Thanks for your note to me about the video of the ‘doctor’ supposedly hitting a patient. I checked it many times before on the Amnesty International page trying to work out what he was doing. It puzzled me that it was presented as evidence for some outrageous claims against doctors and health workers in Syria. It itself is so puzzling. I can’t see that he is doing what you suggest he is doing. I slowed it down and looked and looked, and it is still a mystery as to what he is doing. What was most telling for me was that no one looked disturbed by what he did. If he had been hitting a patient with force, you would think someone in that crowd would have flinched. They looked like a normal crowd of concerned people, people who were there to support the workers, not to inflict pain and punishment on a wounded person.
I haven’t been back to this page for some time because I’ve been busy on Twitter. I’ve discovered that it is a way to communicate with the “world”, and in the process I learn a lot. I’ve found some interesting sites and have created quite a long reference list. It gets longer and longer. And as well as Twitter, I set up a blog for myself today. I hope that I will be able to present an alternative to the singe narrative that still dominates the media and could take war to Syria, a war which could expand and impact on us all.
It is so unfortunate that Amnesty took a strong political stand in the very early days of this crisis. It means it gives no voice to the victims of terror in Syria, and it encourages and amplifies the voice of some very dubious sources. I had a student who worked with the Red Crescent in Syria, and I know that she was someone who could have worked in an impartial, honest way with Amnesty if it had not taken a dogmatic position and closed its doors to such sources.
http://twitter.com/SusanDirgham
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-6hzxGJuG-IdrA5L2zH_YD-ALlUAvgBUYNSlm5klV-A/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1
Michael Wild | Posted on 12 December 2011, 07:04PM | Report comment
Dear Suzan. I won’t go into a long discussion about this particular bit of evidence/non evidence but suggest we need to look at the bigger picture. Even if this video turns out to be a fake it is by no means the sole or crucial bit of evidence behind this judgment. You are talking dozens and dozens of separate individuals being interviewed or coming out with harrowing testimony of torture, shooting and such like. While this blog has a number of fervent believers in the innocence and probabity of the present Syrian goverment these are a very small minority. Pretty well everyone except the Syrian regime and it’s rusted on fan club accept that Human Rights abuses are happening in Syria and have been for some time.
Suzan | Posted on 12 December 2011, 05:18PM | Report comment
I had Amnesty on the highest pedestal. This is what they did with “Truth” and here is the PROOF
There was a news report on Al Jazeera on 25 October where Cilina Nasser from Amnesty said she had “proof” that medical doctors abuse injured “protesters” in Syria. A video accompanying her report showed someone in a white coat and another man standing next to him just outside the door of an ambulance. The white coated man was putting his arm down again and again. The report said this was a doctor hitting a patient. You can not actually see him hitting anyone or anything but he is moving his arm up and down and talking normally.
I stood up and made exactly the same movement. It is not the movement of hitting someone. It is the movement of someone speaking and emphasising a point by putting his hand and arm out.
I then knew it was a big lie and tried to search the report of Al Jazeera news on the internet - I couldn’t find it. So then I searched for the video. Here it is - from May 2011 and it is a split second image that obviously Al Jazeera put in a loop to make it look like the person is “hitting” repeatedly. Watch carefully as it is near the beginning of the video and only for one or two seconds. The man is emphasising his speech that is all - this is a typical way one expresses oneself in the Middle East.
#http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=doctor+hits+patient+syria&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCEQtwIwAQ&url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT7Ljpwvgro&ei=WZamTvmwK8e3iQeQ5LC1Dg&usg=AFQjCNExwX2n1ZenF6CJAjDI2-3vtJhHzg#
Michael Wild | Posted on 29 November 2011, 08:28PM | Report comment
Dear Susan
I suppose bias is in the eye of the beholder and I’d back Amnesty’s position against yours for objectivity and sobriety, anywhere+ anytime. For all your eloquence and support on this blog by a few others the position that major Human Rights Violations are being inflicted on the Syrian people by its government is shared by Amnesty+ Human Rights Watch+nearly the entire Western media+ Al-Jazeera and now the Arab League+Turkey. People in such extreme minorities need compelling evidence and arguments to justify this. Up to now on my reading you and most of your links, you don’t even come close.
With regards to the International Criminal Court, it was invented to deal with criminal governments that the local courts can’t be expected to deal with. It’s unarguable that Syria’s courts can’t be expected to bring to court Mr Assad and his associates. If I and 95% of the informed population are right the Syrian government has committed very serious crimes including many deliberate unlawful killings. Be assured that should Mr Assad ever go there (to my knowledge he hasn’t been indicted but I’m fairly sure it’s investigators haven’t been allowed to) he’ll be treated vastly better and fairer than anything his or his father’s government handed out to its dissidents. He will not be tortured or convicted of confessions taken under duress. He will have independent legal advisers and a genuinely independent judge (a totally unknown quality in political offences in Syria). Neither will he be hanged, and his prison conditions would be vastly better too. Some might say that Mr Assad doesn’t deserve such benign treatment but Amnesty says that being a human being entitles you to some basic rights now matter who you are and what you did.
Mieszko | Posted on 29 November 2011, 04:14PM | Report comment
Amnesty’s position is certainly partisan: it is against any and all violation of human rights, be they perpetrated by NATO, by the USA, by the Syrian government, by Israelis, by Palestinians, by Shell, by the Australian government or by any other party. There is an obscene cache of evidence to support that.
As for that video… well, Dr. Masri talks about Arab League’s lack of legitimacy. To you, Amnesty’s view doesn’t seem to be legitimate either. Tell me then, whose view is legitmate then? Dr. Masri certainly does not avail any party in Syria of responsibility - nor does she claim that Syrian authorities are acting appropriately.
Tell me, what is your view? Are civillians actually being killed? Are Syrian authorities acting legitimately? Is this all smoke and mirrors? What course of action therefore do you recommend? People are clearly dying, and the Syrian government does not seem to be particularly adverse to causing a civil war. What do we do? Wait? Let people die?
I am more than aware of the Children Overboard scandal - however I don’t think there is much support for your narrative that Syrian authorities are acting very nicely. To claim that the Syrian government is acting appropriately or respectfully… well I’m really not sure how to respond to that with any seriousness.
Susan.Dirgham | Posted on 29 November 2011, 08:36AM | Report comment
In understanding the propaganda war being waged against Syria, it might help to recall the propaganda war in the Australian election campaign which had people accepting the ‘children overboard’ story. Also, it would be helpful to recall the stories told in the West in the lead up to the Iraq war. This Age article, “Children overboard: the most despicable of lies” reminds us of both campaigns.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/08/24/1093246520431.html?from=storylhs
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 29 November 2011, 07:57AM | Report comment
This is an interesting analysis of the Arab League’s most recent decision re Syria. It is presented by a Lebanese academic and is worth considering by Amnesty members as AI for months has been strongly supporting actions taken against the Syrian government. Unfortunately, it is an analysis you are unlikely to see or hear in the mainstream Australian media. Formulas, cliches and hackneyed phrases are most people’s fall back position on the most complicated human and political story of Syria.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDXvfNTQNZ4
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 29 November 2011, 12:06AM | Report comment
Dear Michael,
How can I provide evidence that Amnesty is ‘causing a war’? Without a doubt Amnesty has adopted a partisan position on the crisis in Syria. It supports one version of events in Syria: a “brutal regime” is killing peaceful protestors and that regime and its president must be dealt with by bodies such as the UN and the ICC.
AI Report, 27 April 2011: “The UN Security Council must refer the situation in Syria to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Amnesty International has said.”
http://www.amnesty.org.au/news/comments/25453/
The reports continues, “The organisation rejected claims by the Syrian government that many of the killings had been committed by anti-government armed groups, saying that it had seen no evidence to support such allegations.”
I was in Damascus over Easter 2011 for one week, so at the time the report was being compiled. It was very clear then that militants were killing soldiers and security forces as well as civilians. I reported on the killings of teenage boys.
http://pool.abc.net.au/media/syria-questions-must-be-asked-and-answered
http://pool.abc.net.au/media/christians-under-attack-syria
I notice Michael you were strident in your support of AI’s call to refer Syria to the ICC in April.
“I’d love to see them in the ICC. That was what it was invented for.”
I believe a lack of sober judgement, a rush to accept any accusation or story against the Syrian government and a sensationalizing of the crisis in Syria certainly inflames people and discourages what is needed to reconcile adversaries. The situation in Syria is and has always been extremely complex. Since April, I can see no evidence that Amnesty is concerned about presenting an objective analysis. It has taken a stand, and it is sticking to it.
For many people in the world, Amnesty presents the “truth”. Re Syria, it supports the side of people egged on to kill by radical clerics, a very dangerous and deadly position to take.
Susan Dirgham | Posted on 28 November 2011, 11:19PM | Report comment
Dear Mieszko,
Unfortunately, the resignations of Al-Jazeera reporters haven’t been reported in the Western media. Much of the truth of what is happening in Syria is not reported in the West; there is a media war being waged against Syria.
Today I heard the story of Sari Saoud, the young boy who was recently killed by militants while in the street outside a shop in Homs. Images of his mother grieving over his body were taken and sent to Al-Jazeera which confidently reported that the Syrian army had killed him. But that was disputed in the Syrian media (see article at link:
http://www.champress.net/index.php?q=en/Article/view/106759 )
Many people in Australia might not trust the account of the boy’s death in this Cham Press article because we are continually reminded that anything in the Syrian media is “propaganda”. However, I have seen the family on Syrian TV being interviewed and their grief and anger is heart-felt. It is not forced or fake. Their anger is directly at Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya and at the ‘terrorists’ that killed Sari. They call on the army to return to their area to protect the people. It is apparently an area in Homs which is very dangerous because of the activities of the militia (or whatever you call them).
I was with a Syrian Australian today who related the story of his uncle, a young farmer, who was killed on the outskirts of Damascus 5 or 6 months ago. He and 2 friends drove to Damascus to sell their vegetables when their car was shot at; two of them were killed, but the uncle didn’t die immediately. The militants apparently took him to a makeshift hospital and his throat was cut there. Al-Jazeera reported his death - and I presume showed a photo of his body - gave his name but declared he had been killed by the army.
In regard to this and the resignations of Al-Jazeera reporters, ABC’s 4 Corners should be on to it
http://www.turkishnews.com/en/content/2011/04/29/al-jazeera-beirut-bureau-chief-resigns/
i
Michael Wild | Posted on 28 November 2011, 09:52PM | Report comment
I think you need to calm down and get a grip here Susan. I challenge you to provide a shred of evidence that Amnesty is in any way causing a war beyond researching and publicizing Human Rights Violations. While I accept you are highly Syrian focused in fact Amnesty publicizes Human Rights Violations in well over 100 of the World’s countries. Do you think we’re trying to set up wars in them too? If AI stops publicizing Human Rights Abusers for fear of starting or inflaming civil wars then we will become a biased, ineffective agency, however much those in power would prefer it.
Apart from the fevered imaginations of some there is no serious talk of a foreign invasion of Syria at all. If you mean a Civil War, than while it favours the regime’s story to say meddling foreigners start them, they are nearly always home grown. Outsiders get only get involved after they start. Contrary to the fantasies of extreme Western power in distant countries is at best only influence. There are many, many things happening in the Middle East that would not be happening at all if the US/NATO/EU was as powerful as many say. Only the conspiracy theorists doubt that recent Arab Spring was a major surprise to the West and indeed everyone.
Finally you should be careful about Voltaire Network. It has a record of saying contentious things on flimsy evidence. Its President Thierry Meysaan caused a split in the movement for bias and has written a book saying the September 11th was an “inside job” done by the American government! He recently distinguished himself in Tripoli by saying the Gaddafi forces had pushed the rebels from the city on 22/8/2011. It fell to the rebels the next day. He also said all the other journalists were spies with the CIA and MI5.