Amnesty International welcomes continued 10-year commitment for traditional Aboriginal homelands
Amnesty International welcomes today's joint renewed commitment between the Federal and Northern Territory Governments to invest $221 million over ten years for the provisions of basic essential and municipal services to remote outstations.
This announcement indicates that both levels of Government have listened to the concerns of Aboriginal Peoples living on homelands.
The human rights organisation hopes this announcement represents a genuine recognition of traditional homelands. It is also hoped that this leads to a new collaborative era between the two governments and Aboriginal homeland communities.
Amnesty International calls for this renewed commitment to translate into a genuine partnership with the communities living on their ancestral lands. The two governments need to work alongside homeland communities to identify longterm solutions to ensure their viability.
Over twenty years of research confirm Aboriginal Peoples on homelands are able to maintain their cultural identity, are healthier and live longer.
The inquiry into the Stronger Futures legislation heard overwhelming evidence of concern from Aboriginal Peoples wanting to stay on their traditional homelands.
Amnesty International has outlined the extreme disparity in funding between homelands which support 35 percent of Aboriginal Peoples in the Northern Territory and Growth Towns. The vast majority of government spending in the Northern Territory continues to only be allocated to people living in Growth Towns which only make up 24 percent of the Aboriginal population.
Amnesty International continues to call for the two Governments to implement an overarching plan for homelands to be adequately funded in the upcoming Federal Budget and for any levels of funding for Aboriginal affairs in the Northern Territory to be equitably dispersed to reflect where Aboriginal people actually live.




Comments
Michael Wild | Posted on 29 March 2012, 02:12PM | Report comment
According to AIA there are approximately 500 remote communities (“homelands”?) in the NT. The $221 million therefore amounts to something less that half a million over 10 years per community. Given that the remote communities will be more expensive to support than a “growth town” it would seem to me that at least some of these communities are going to miss out. Amnesty speaks of the housing situation and while I’m no builder looking at AIA’s piece on Utopia suggests some of the dwellings need to be demolished and built from scratch. This amount of money is not going to go very far at all.
The unfortunate truth is that it’s impossible to provide the same level of service to all of these communities as would be possible to a small town and some hard decisions will need to be made as to which ones are viable and which ones are not. Amnesty is in the convenient position of not having to make these tough decisions. On current form I’d suggest that the communities that miss out are going to complain and Amnesty is going to take up their cause.
My worry is that Amnesty could end in something like the Americans in the Vietnam War. Tied down to a lengthy, resource sapping struggle, with some short term successes but no chance of actually winning the war.