Print this Email this

Indonesia’s rule to uphold the death penalty deplored

31 October 2007, 09:07AM

image
Amnesty Interntional Netherlands’ death penalty
action ©AI

Amnesty International is deeply disappointed with yesterday's Indonesian Constitutional Court ruling to uphold the death penalty for drug offences.

The Indonesian Constitutional Court ruled in a split decision not to support a legal challenge to repeal the provisions in the 1997 Narcotics Law.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all circumstances, as a violation to the right of life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Amnesty International noted that the decision goes against the conclusions of the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, who concluded that the death penalty be understood as "a quite exceptional measure" imposed where there was an intention to kill resulting in loss of life.

"It is particularly disappointing that this ultimate and extreme penalty is now being upheld," said Louise Vischer, Coordinator of Amnesty International's Asia Pacific Anti Death Penalty Regional Project. "It is legitimate for the Indonesia government to take appropriate law-enforcement measures against drug offenders but there is no scientific evidence showing that the death penalty deters would-be traffickers more effectively than other punishments."

It is feared that this decision will now impact negatively on the fate of over 90 prisoners currently under sentence of death.

The Court ruling flies in the face of a worldwide trend towards restricting and abolishing the death penalty. The UN General Assembly is expected to vote next month on a resolution calling for a global moratorium on executions.

Amnesty International is calling on the Indonesian government to follow the example set by 133 countries around the world which have already abolished the death penalty in law or practice, including neighbouring Philippines, which abolished the death penalty in 2006.

Background

  • The accused who filed the petition to the Constitutional Court were three Australians, named Scott Rush, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran and two Indonesians, named Edith Sianturi and Rani Andriani.
  • The Constitutional Court decided that the three Australians did not have the legal capacity to challenge the constitution as foreigners.
  • Three of the nine judges argued that the right to life was absolute, whilst six found the right to life enshrined in the constitution was not absolute and therefore ruled that the death penalty under the Narcotics Act was valid.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Make an impact

You can make a difference right now. Your action will help to shine the light of hope into people's lives across the world.

You can make a difference right now. Your action will help shine the light of hope into people's lives across the world.

Check out what 4909 people are doing right now to support human rights.

Act now

Stay Informed

Sign up for email updates

Get Involved

Two Columbian boys smiling and holding their arms out with their thumbs up - a sign of hope

Amnesty International relies on your support to continue our vital work protecting human rights. Please help us keep governments accountable, bring the guilty to justice, and save lives.

Donate