Liberian president must repeal death penalty law
28 July 2008, 08:57AM
Amnesty International condemned the signing by Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf of a law calling for the death penalty for anyone convicted of armed robbery, terrorism or hijacking offences if these crimes result in death.
The organisation called on President Johnson-Sirleaf to repeal the law.
Amnesty International said that the law directly violates Liberia's obligations under the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Liberia acceded to on 16 September 2005 and which abolishes the death penalty.
Liberian law already included the possibility of the death penalty, but in 2005, the country should have incorporated into law the Second Optional Protocol, thereby abolishing the death penalty for all crimes.
Under customary international law, as reflected in Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which Liberia ratified on 29 August 1985, a state "may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as a justification for its failure to perform a treaty".
The continent of Africa is largely free of executions, with only seven of the region's 53 countries known to have carried out executions in 2007. According to Amnesty International's information, 14 countries in Africa are abolitionist in law and a further 21 in practice.
While states have the duty to protect the right to life and security of individuals from violent crimes, there is no valid scientific evidence to support that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than other punishments.
All too often, politicians have found the death penalty a useful tool in appearing to address crime and make the public feel safe. In reality, the death penalty has no such effect and simply distracts from the need to address the causes of crime and providing effective remedies – which is what the Liberian government should be doing.
Background information
The Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, aimed at the abolition of the death penalty worldwide, was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1989. It provides for the total abolition of the death penalty but allows states parties to retain the death penalty in time of war if they make a reservation to that effect at the time of ratifying or acceding to the Protocol.
Any state that is a party to the ICCPR can become a party to the Protocol.
By Category
By month
Make an impact
You can make a difference right now. Your action will help shine the light of hope into people's lives across the world.
Check out what 4910 people are doing right now to support human rights.
Stay Informed
Get Involved
Amnesty International relies on your support to continue our vital work protecting human rights. Please help us keep governments accountable, bring the guilty to justice, and save lives.
Sitewide information
- Copyright © Amnesty International Australia
- ABN: 640 0280 6233
- Phone: 1300 300 920
Comments
Comments are submitted by members of the public and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of Amnesty International Australia. If you find a comment objectionable please contact the web editor.
NickfromAvvo
6 August 2008, 10:34AM
If a country with as many resources as the United States has gotten so many murder convictions wrong, I can only wonder what the error rate is for Liberia. Whether or not you support the death penalty in principle, it’s pretty disturbing to think about how many people are falsely accused in places like Liberia, and whether the accused even afforded basic due process rights like having access to <A HREF="http://www.avvo.com">lawyers</A>.
Page 1 of 1 pages